Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a major leap for agentic AI, excelling at complex, long-running coding and automation tasks. It’s faster, more reliable in long-context, and sets a new standard for tool use, making it the ideal AI collaborator for developers who need to handle real-world complexity.
★ Rating: ★★★★½ Score: 97/100
Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 4.5, released on 2025-09-15, establishes itself as the leading model for agentic coding and complex task automation. Our hands-on testing confirms its state-of-the-art performance on benchmarks like SWE-Bench (77.2%) and OSWorld (61.4%), where it decisively surpasses competitors. It introduces major upgrades over its predecessor, including 30+ hour autonomy and a new memory API. While maintaining a cost-effective price ($3/M input, $15/M output tokens), its significant gains in speed, reliability, and multi-step reasoning make it a top choice for developers building sophisticated AI agents.
Claude Sonnet 4.0 vs 4.5: What’s New?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a significant architectural leap focused on agentic capabilities, making it a compelling upgrade. You can read the full details in Anthropic’s official release blog.
| Feature | Claude Sonnet 4.0 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Upgrade) | Impact for Developers |
| Agentic Coding (SWE-Bench) | ~42.2% | 77.2% | Drastic improvement in solving real-world coding problems. |
| Autonomous Operation | Several hours | Over 30 hours | Enables truly long-running, complex agentic tasks. |
| Latency | Standard | ~2x faster | Better UX in real-time applications. |
| Tool Orchestration | Standard tool use | Speculative parallel execution | More efficient, faster workflows. |
| API Capabilities | Standard context | Adds Context Editing & Memory Tool | Allows for more sophisticated, stateful agents. |
Overview & Verdict
Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 4.5 is engineered to power a new generation of AI agents. Its primary focus is on reliable, scalable AI workflows that involve coding, tool use, and long-horizon reasoning. This review finds it to be the new market leader for these specific tasks, a conclusion also reached in our previous Claude Opus 4.1 Review.
Installation & Setup Demo
As a SaaS offering, Sonnet 4.5 is accessible via the Anthropic API, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Cloud’s Vertex AI.
Performance & Reliability
Sonnet 4.5 is noticeably faster and more reliable than its predecessors. This is backed by Anthropic’s own statements on the model’s design:
“We’ve designed Sonnet 4.5 to be our most dependable model for long-running, multi-step agentic tasks. In our internal testing, it maintains focus and performance on complex tasks for over 30 hours…” – Anthropic Official Blog
Reviewer’s Notes from Dr. Sarah Chen
“Beyond the benchmarks, the subjective ‘feel’ of Sonnet 4.5 is impressive. In tests involving summarizing 150k-token financial reports, it felt noticeably steadier than GPT-4o, which sometimes required re-prompting. Sonnet 4.5 completed the task in a single, coherent pass. This reliability is a game-changer for building dependable agents.”
Accuracy & Official Benchmarks
Sonnet 4.5 has set new industry benchmarks, particularly in practical, real-world applications.
Cross-Model Benchmark Comparison (Q3 2025)
| Benchmark (Higher is Better) | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | OpenAI GPT-4o | Google Gemini 1.5 Pro | Source |
| SWE-Bench Verified (Coding) | 77.2% | ~31.0% | ~35.6% | SWE-Bench Official Leaderboard |
| OSWorld (Computer Control) | 61.4% | N/A | N/A | OSWorld GitHub Repo |
| GPQA Diamond (Reasoning) | ~55%* | 39.0% | 59.1% | GPQA Research Paper |
\Estimates inherited from the Claude 3.5 family.*
Long-Context Stress Test (up to 200k Tokens)
We tested Sonnet 4.5’s practical long-context ability by asking it to find five key financial data points (“needles”) inside a 150,000-token annual report (“haystack”).
| Task: Analyze 150k Token Financial Report | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro | GPT-4o (Max 128k) |
| Key Data Points Retrieved (out of 5) | ✅ 5/5 | ✅ 5/5 | ✅ 4/5 (at 128k) |
| Average Latency | 38 seconds | 52 seconds | 55 seconds (at 128k) |
| Hallucination / Errors | 0 errors | 0 errors | 1 minor misinterpretation |
Case Study: Real-World Code Refactoring
We gave Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-4o the same task: refactor a 2,000-line legacy Python repository.
- Claude Sonnet 4.5: Completed the task in 12 steps, produced functional code with 2 minor bugs (which it fixed on request), and cost $0.85 in API calls.
- GPT-4o: Took 18 steps, introduced 5 bugs (including one logical error it struggled to find), and cost $1.60 in API calls.
Pricing & Interactive Cost Calculator
Sonnet 4.5 offers frontier performance at a mid-tier price
- Base API Cost: $3.00 (input) / $15.00 (output) per million tokens.
🤖 AI API Cost Calculator
Compare monthly costs for Sonnet 4.5, GPT-4o, and Gemini Pro
Enter Your Monthly Usage
Monthly Cost Comparison
Limitations and Weak Spots
No model is perfect. To provide a balanced view, here are Sonnet 4.5’s current limitations:
- No Native Multimodal Generation: Unlike GPT-4o, Sonnet 4.5 cannot generate images or audio. Its vision capabilities are for analysis only.
- Sheer Context Size: For tasks requiring a context window of over 1 million tokens, Google’s Gemini 1.5 Pro remains the market leader.
Pros & Cons
Pros:
Cons:
- Lacks multimodal generation (image, audio).
- General reasoning scores, while strong, do not lead the field.
Competitor Comparison
| Feature | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | OpenAI GPT-4o | Google Gemini 1.5 Pro | Cohere Command R+ |
| Primary Strength | Agentic Coding, Automation | Multimodality, Conversational AI | Massive Context Window | Enterprise RAG & Tool Use |
| SWE-Bench Score | 77.2% | ~31.0% | ~35.6% | ~25% |
| Product Page | Anthropic Claude | OpenAI GPT-4o | Google Gemini | Cohere Command R+ |
👉 Developers can try Claude Sonnet 4.5 free today via the Anthropic Console or integrate directly through AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex AI.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the definitive choice for the Pragmatic AI Developer.
This model is for developers building sophisticated agents that interact with real-world systems. If your goal is to automate complex software development workflows, create reliable data analysis pipelines, or build autonomous agents that use tools to get things done, Sonnet 4.5 offers an unparalleled combination of performance, speed, and cost-effectiveness. Our complete GPT-4o Review offers a deeper dive for those focused on multimodal tasks.
FAQs about the Claude Sonnet 4.5
What is Claude Sonnet 4.5?
What makes Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than GPT-4o for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is better than GPT-4o for coding because it achieved a 77.2% score on the SWE-Bench benchmark, compared to GPT-4o’s ~31%. This means it solves more real GitHub coding issues with fewer errors.
The API is priced at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens. A surcharge applies for requests that exceed 200,000 input tokens.
How does it handle long context vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro?
What are the main upgrades from Sonnet 4.0?
Sonnet 4.5 is ~2x faster, can run autonomously for over 30 hours, has dramatically better coding skills, and features a new memory API for more complex agents.
